ast-monkey-util^2.0.1

Quick Take

import { strict as assert } from "assert";
import {
  pathNext,
  pathPrev,
  pathUp,
} from "ast-monkey-util";

assert.equal(pathNext("9.children.3"), "9.children.4");

assert.equal(
  pathPrev("9.children.33"),
  "9.children.32"
);

assert.equal(
  pathUp("9.children.1.children.2"),
  "9.children.1"
);

Idea

codsen-parser and emlint both use object-path  notation. This utility program contains helper functions to traverse the paths.

Conceptually, we'd use ast-monkey-traverse, identify the node we need, then get its path (from the same program, from callbacks), then amend that path (using this program), then use object-path to get/set/delete that path.

API - pathNext

pathNext(str)

It takes (a string) path and increments the last digit:

console.log(pathNext("0"));
// => "1"

console.log(pathNext("9.children.3"));
// => "9.children.4"

console.log(pathNext("9.children.1.children.0"));
// => "9.children.1.children.1"

API - pathPrev

pathPrev(str)

It takes (a string) path and decrements the last digit:

console.log(pathPrev("0"));
// => null

console.log(pathPrev("9.children.33"));
// => "9.children.32"

console.log(pathPrev("9.children.1.children.2"));
// => "9.children.1.children.1"

API - pathUp

pathUp(str)

It takes (a string) path and goes "one level" up, discarding the last two path parts:

console.log(pathUp("1"));
// => null

console.log(pathUp("9.children.3"));
// => "9"

console.log(pathUp("9.children.1.children.2"));
// => "9.children.1"

Practically, if you think, codsen-parser always outputs an array. It contains zero or more plain objects, each representing a tag, a chunk of text, a comment tag and so on.

Since root element is array, paths of those plain objects are digits: 0, 1, 5.children.0 and so on.

In codsen-parser AST's, child nodes are nested within children key - its value is array:

The following HTML:

<a>text</a>

Would yield AST (many keys omitted):

[
  {
    "type": "tag",
    "start": 0,
    "end": 3,
    "value": "<a>",
    "attribs": [],
    "children": [
      {
        "type": "text",
        "start": 3,
        "end": 7,
        "value": "text"
      }
    ]
  },
  {
    "type": "tag",
    "start": 7,
    "end": 11,
    "value": "</a>",
    "attribs": [],
    "children": []
  }
]

Thus, a text node for value "text" (one with "start": 3 above) is at the path 0.children.0 (first element's first child node) and "going up" would mean "0" - that's splitting by dot into an array and discarding the last two elements from that array, then joining it back with a dot.

0 . children . 0
        ^      ^
    these two are removed during the "go up" action

object-path notation

The notation used in this program is based on object-path  - an array elements are marked with dot - if object's key value is an array and we want to a path of the fourth element in there, it's key.3, not key[3].

A drawback of this notation is that keys can't be numeric strings. But the advantage of this notation is that all children are now separated with a dot - you can split by dot String.split(".") and quickly process the path elements, unlike JS notation with square brackets.

Changelog

See it in the monorepo , on GitHub.

Contributing

To report bugs or request features or assistance, raise an issue on GitHub .

Any code contributions welcome! All Pull Requests will be dealt promptly.

Licence

MIT 

Copyright © 2010–2021 Roy Revelt and other contributors